In an application staging project on which I am working, I am trying to decide what to use Or to make code. Our targets have to create the least dependence and build generation drives for a domain-driven design with user stories. The first step will be to create a test from the user's stories, but we want the domain experts to write different stories in different media (such as custom apps, word, etc.) and still produce stories from the test.
What do I still know:
- Codedom requires .NET, but can only output to NET class files (like .CC.vb) Are there. The difficulty level is quite high.
- T4 requires codedom and vs standard + The level of difficulty is quite reasonable, especially with.
- Oslo is very new I have no idea of dependence, but I think you should at least be at Net 3.5. I'm also not sure about the complexity of the generation of code generation or the new grammar. However, domain experts can easily write user stories in IntelLeadpad, besides, MGRRR is not sure about the ease of changing stories in Word.
What are your thoughts, experiences, etc. with any of the above tools? We want to be with Microsoft or open source tools.
Go with T4 - Easy Decision
- Oslo very new And the tools are only raw for having an eval-only technology
- CodeDOM is powerful, if you need to generate CLR classes to run, the time, and the output of your generated Ready to sacrifice the easy change for
- Using T4 (with T4 Toolkit) general purpose code generation tool is easy. I have only made difficulty in scheduling the problem so far.
Comments
Post a Comment