So there is a lot of discussion about how many files are appropriate in a directory: less than 1000 thousand on the old file system Staying Newer than New Lakh New Generally, the suggestion is to create a sub-directory for every few thousand files.
The next question is, should I put the maximum number of directories in a directory? Kill them deeply as a nest hunt, killing the DIAR tree tricycle. Are they nesting for shallow?
Applications can not properly handle large directory entries from the perspective of practicality. For example, Windows Explorer is stuck with several thousand directory entries (I have Vista crashed, but XP is supposed to handle it better).
Since you mention the nesting directories, keep in mind that the limitations are fully qualified (with the Drive Designator and path) for the length of filenames, this operating system will vary with the file system.
This is considered to be 255 for Windows NTFS, however, I have problems with commands and API functions with full well filenames at around 120 characters. I have mapped networks There are also issues with long way names on Drive (at least Vista and I.E. Explorer 7).
Also there are limitations at the nesting level of the subdirectory, for example CD-ROM (ISO 9660) is limited to 8 directory levels (if you have your directory structure in the CD-ROM, or any other file system If you want to copy, keep in mind something).
There are a lot of discrepancies when you push the file system to the extreme (while the file system may theoretically handle it, there may be apps and libraries).
Comments
Post a Comment