.net - Reflection: walking a class for automated testing -

I have classes that store data, and there are ways to get data for different loans.

I have the code which runs the code and pulls the data back, but according to the MSDN coding guidelines, the assets are just going to get data, nothing. My property actually goes to a screen on a mainframe and scrap data, so when I'm doing a mousing on an asset or taking a mouse over the code in the debugger, sometimes it is triggered, in that mainframe Which screen I change. So I would like to change my reflection walker so that it can pull back the results of the function and change the functions into unbreeded data.

  Public GetAllReadableProperties (Object Bytes as Object) String Deam result as new system. Text.StringBuilder (300) Reflections for each item as a system. With obj.GetType.GetProperties () item in Property Infony. If read, then the result. Append (.Name + ":") if GETIndexParameters (). Length = 0 then the dim values ​​in the form of the object = .getValue (obj, nothing) if the value is nothing then the result. AppendLine ("& lt; Nothing & gt;") Other Results AppendLine (value.ToString) termination results either. AppendLine ("indexed") ends if the end ends with the next return result. Toasting End Function  

How Do I Go to Ways? What would be the easiest way to tag some functions for the default function, or do not have the default running? Custom Attributes?

Will this code work at all for the structure passed in exchange for the class?

When I get it, I want to code this code in creating a datagate for data agewriview display, maybe going forward, maybe [debuggerbrowsable (never debugger brazable station)]

?

However, perhaps a better method is to follow the guidelines, and to populate the properties, along with ways to populate them? That is to call the "populate" method before passing the object to the grid (what you want by saying this)

For a straight ... Well, if a straight (only for very specific reasons) is always irreversible then a lazy loading structure is very much an oxymoron. You probably will run the risk of losing track of what is happening here ... short version: make it a square (quite possibly one that is IDisposable , and possibly a final form) .